Faculty Senate Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Meeting held in Bryant 209
Agenda
- Senator Albritton opened the meeting at 7:00 p.m.
- First order of business: Approve minutes of last meeting
- Moved
- Seconded
- Approved unanimously
- Moved
- Second order of business: Committee Reports
- Executive committee
- No report
- University services
- No report
- Finance
- No report
- Executive committee
- Third order of business: Report of the Academic Affairs committee on academic dishonesty
- Best course of action was to ask CETL to sponsor a faculty development luncheon on the subject
- Arrived at after departmental and administrative consultation
- Workshop will run in the fall
- Question: have the academic discipline committees seen more cheating?
- Anecdotally, no
- Most are plagiarism complaints rather than cheating on standardized tests
- Best course of action was to ask CETL to sponsor a faculty development luncheon on the subject
- Fourth order of business: Academic support report on building temperatures
- Origin of new temperature policy
- IHL energy management council mandate
- Energy prices projected to go up
- IHL Mandate
- Reduce energy use per square foot by 30% from 2006 baseline by 2016
- Do so without tuition increases
- Response by Ole Miss
- New equipment
- More efficient monitors
- New 78 degree building temperature
- Why 78 degrees?
- Picked by may other universities
- Determined to have maximum impact
- Decision was made by Larry Sparks, admittedly without faculty input
- Comments by Larry Sparks
- Temperature was temporarily dropped to 76, 72 for finals week
- Temperatures will be reset based on feedback
- 78 is upper limit, not lower
- Goal is difficult re: 2006 because Ole Miss has already done many of the easy steps in energy efficiency
- Difficulty in measuring results; few meters exist for individual buildings
- Complaints have been heard; move to 78 degrees may have been too aggressive; move to 74 degrees may be interim step
- Areas outside of temperature set points must be fixed
- Questions
- Question: what are some auxiliary units that pay for their own power?
- A good example is student housing: they must pay for their utilities from rent
- 15-16 such auxiliary units on campus
- Question: Are there going to be policies for weekdays and weekends?
- Nights, weekends, and holidays will be set back a bit
- Question: How do we get on a list for a building that would be exempt from such fluxes over breaks?
- Student housing, animal housing, are some that are exempt
- Question: What is the administration policy on research over weekends?
- Contact Larry Sparks to request exceptions to set back policies; the policy is to try and be efficient and not suck resources from other areas (like salaries)
- Question: what are some auxiliary units that pay for their own power?
- Statement from Business Administration, with 16 points of concerns, was read
- Salient points include perceptions of personal sacrifice at the expense of teaching and research, ADA concerns, student use, illicit installation of fans and air conditioners
- Sparks: unit is a support unit; perceptions of lack of support for research and teaching are erroneous
- 78 degrees was too far of a reach and communication was poor
- Energy management committee with faculty representation could be coming
- Question: how do setpoints work? Do they take a room’s actual ambient temperature into account (e.g. with computers heating it up?)
- Buildings on the central chilled-water loop should do so, but there may be buildings and areas
- Question: Are fluctuations within buildings reflected in set points? Rooms seem to fall inside and outside range, anecdotally, fairly often?
- Question: What percent of the budget is spent on utilities?
- There’s no percentage but about $12 million out of $270 million
- Question: What about individualized plan? Rooms with higher use or mutant temperatures could be tweaked one by one?
- Sparks: Individualized changes are possible, but no idea of how complex that is and what the costs might be
- Motion: could we refer to committee?
- Will be referred to committee for August/September
- Going forward
- Was 78 degrees the correct temperature?
- Ole Miss is not meeting its goals
- Origin of new temperature policy
- Fifth order of business: Report of the governance committee on Ombudsman et al.
- Issue of “peer to peer bullying” among faulty
- MSU has a grievance policy and a whistleblower policy
- USC is discussing “faculty incivility”
- LSU is chairing a meeting on the issue at the end of May; attendance of a UM rep may be possible
- UArk has a workshop; considers “collegiality” when making appointments
- Texas A&M is working on “grievance process”
- The prospect of an ombudsman or representative for faculty members suffering the above
- To governance committee for next year (fall 2012)
- A designated person or policy might be a good idea, whether a single permanent position or a rotating voluntary one
- Could even be extended for students
- Should be a problem addressed at the highest level of management with standards set top-down
- Statement of governance committee:
- Question at hand was whether a faculty member forcing another to teach a course is a violation of academic freedom
- More information is needed, but conflicts with anonymity of original respondent
- Issue of “peer to peer bullying” among faulty
- Sixth order of business: Report of the governance committee on major search committees
- Issue is with agreements between senate and administration approximately 10 years ago
- Searches at dean level or above would result in faculty-wide announcement of a search committee and said committee’s members
- Said agreement was not added to policy database; senate could perhaps take it up and see that said agreement becomes added to official policy
- Item will be referred to governance committee
- Further searches will be announced
- Dean of graduate school progress
- Candidate has been named and accepted
- Dean of school of applied sciences progress
- Candidate list has been approved and forwarded
- Vice-chancellor search progress
- 4 candidates have interviewed
- Thoughts on candidates are welcome
- Issue is with agreements between senate and administration approximately 10 years ago
- Seventh order of business: Old business
- None
- Eighth order of business: New business
- Current senate term ends August 31
- Elections to senate must be processed by that time
- New members will elect officers and constitute committees and their chairs
- Senator Albritton will be retiring from both the Senate and the university
- Hopes that spirit of shared governance will persist
- Is impressed by how often upper administration seems to listen to the senate
- Senate consultations seem to provide admirable basis for continued faculty advocacy
- Sen. Reithel: Issue of elective “W” grades
- Univ. of Georgia limits “W” grades to 4
- Refer to Academic Affairs for investigation
- Current senate term ends August 31
- Senator Albritton closed the meeting at 9:00 p.m.